SITARAM INVESTMENT LIMITED BHASKAR SENGUPTA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/9342/2026

Case under Income Tax Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0176972026

Filing Number

WPA/9105/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/9342/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

INCOME TAX ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SITARAM INVESTMENT LIMITED BHASKAR SENGUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

    WPA 9342/2026 Summary The court disposed of the petition without ruling on merits, instead directing the income tax appellate authority to decide Sitaram Investment Limited's appeal within eight weeks. The petitioner had challenged a Rs. 63,41,050 tax demand arising from a reassessment that added Rs. 70,00,000 for an allegedly escaped transaction with Bandani Fashions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  4. 05-May-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  5. 04-May-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/9342/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPA 9342/2026 Summary The court disposed of the petition without ruling on merits, instead directing the income tax appellate authority to decide Sitaram Investment Limited's appeal within eight weeks. The petitioner had challenged a Rs. 63,41,050 tax demand arising from a reassessment that added Rs. 70,00,000 for an allegedly escaped transaction with Bandani Fashions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case