SK. KASEM SANDIPAN PAL vs WBSEDCL AND ORS — WPA/9193/2026

Case under West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0176262026

Filing Number

WPA/9064/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/9193/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK. KASEM SANDIPAN PAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WBSEDCL AND ORS

  2. 2.THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER AND AREA MANAGER, BIRBHUM AREA OFFICE

  3. 3.THE ASSESSING OFFICER AND STATION MANAGER, ILLAMBAZAR CUSTOMER CARE CENTRE

  4. 4.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE ILLAMBAZAR POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition challenging provisional and final assessment bills issued by WBSEDCL for alleged illegal electricity theft. The court found the petitioner should have pursued the statutory appeal remedy under the Electricity Act, 2003 within prescribed time limits and held that approaching the court after expiration of appeal period with undue delay was untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/9193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging provisional and final assessment bills issued by WBSEDCL for alleged illegal electricity theft. The court found the petitioner should have pursued the statutory appeal remedy under the Electricity Act, 2003 within prescribed time limits and held that approaching the court after expiration of appeal period with undue delay was untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case