BALGOPAL COMMERCIAL LTD PRASHANT SHARMA vs PANNALAL BENGANI AND ORS — FMAT/134/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0176112026

Filing Number

FMAT/138/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

FMAT/134/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Title Declaration ( 51 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALGOPAL COMMERCIAL LTD PRASHANT SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANNALAL BENGANI AND ORS

  2. 2.NARESH GUPTA ALIAS NARESH KR. GUPTA

  3. 3.AJAY MOONDRA

  4. 4.KUMAR MANGALAM CHOUDHARY

  5. 5.THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT CO. LTD.

  6. 6.ASHOK KUMAR AGARWALA

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Order XLI Rule 11

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  3. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

    The case (FMAT 134/2026) was adjourned. The court ordered the appellant (Balgopal Commercial Limited) to serve copies of both applications (CAN 1 and CAN 2 of 2026) on respondents 1-4 and 6, with the matter to be relisted on June 22, 2026. An affidavit-of-service must be filed by that date, and copies must also be served on respondent no. 5's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMAT/134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case (FMAT 134/2026) was adjourned. The court ordered the appellant (Balgopal Commercial Limited) to serve copies of both applications (CAN 1 and CAN 2 of 2026) on respondents 1-4 and 6, with the matter to be relisted on June 22, 2026. An affidavit-of-service must be filed by that date, and copies must also be served on respondent no. 5's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case