MUKHTAR ALAM ANIRBAN ROY vs SHAKIL AHMED AND ANR — CO/1312/2026

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1997 Section NA. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0175592026

Filing Number

CO/1322/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1312/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1997 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKHTAR ALAM ANIRBAN ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKIL AHMED AND ANR

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CO 1312/2026 Mukhtar Alam v. Shakil Ahmed & Anr. The revisional petition challenges an appellate court order dated November 19, 2025, which directed the petitioner to produce his mother's passport and bank account documents from Indian Overseas Bank for signature comparison. The petitioner argues the order contains jurisdictional error as these documents are not part of trial court records. The case was adjourned to June 9, 2026, for further hearing after service of notice on opposite parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1312/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO 1312/2026 Mukhtar Alam v. Shakil Ahmed & Anr. The revisional petition challenges an appellate court order dated November 19, 2025, which directed the petitioner to produce his mother's passport and bank account documents from Indian Overseas Bank for signature comparison. The petitioner argues the order contains jurisdictional error as these documents are not part of trial court records. The case was adjourned to June 9, 2026, for further hearing after service of notice on opposite parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case