ATINDRA DEY SARKAR DEBASIS KAR vs SUSHMITA DEY SARKAR (SAHA) — CO/1292/2026
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section NA. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0172592026
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
CO/1299/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
CO/1292/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Matrimonial Disputes ( 34 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ATINDRA DEY SARKAR DEBASIS KAR
Respondent(s)
SUSHMITA DEY SARKAR (SAHA)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 08-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 07-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 06-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 05-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case CO/1292/2026 Summary: The High Court at Calcutta admitted a civil revision petition by Atindra Dey Sarkar challenging a February 20, 2026 order from the Fast Track Court at Ranaghat. The lower court had directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 8,000/month maintenance to the respondent and Rs. 4,000/month for the child (totaling Rs. 12,000/month) under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, plus Rs. 5,000 for litigation costs. The petition was adjourned; the respondent must be served notice, with the matter to be heard immediately after Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case CO/1292/2026 Summary: The High Court at Calcutta admitted a civil revision petition by Atindra Dey Sarkar challenging a February 20, 2026 order from the Fast Track Court at Ranaghat. The lower court had directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 8,000/month maintenance to the respondent and Rs. 4,000/month for the child (totaling Rs. 12,000/month) under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, plus Rs. 5,000 for litigation costs. The petition was adjourned; the respondent must be served notice, with the matter to be heard immediately after Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts