JAHANGIR FAKIR DEBAPRIYA MAJUMDER vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/8861/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0171482026
Filing Number
WPA/8825/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/8861/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAHANGIR FAKIR DEBAPRIYA MAJUMDER
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition appeal filed by Jahangir Fakir against the Union of India regarding election matters. Since election results had been published and respondent no. 10 succeeded in the election, the court held that the appellant's remedy lies before the appropriate statutory forum rather than the High Court, and declined to interfere with the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Application (Gr - IX)
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/8861/2026
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition appeal filed by Jahangir Fakir against the Union of India regarding election matters. Since election results had been published and respondent no. 10 succeeded in the election, the court held that the appellant's remedy lies before the appropriate statutory forum rather than the High Court, and declined to interfere with the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts