PARIMAL MANDAL DEBARSHI BRAHMA vs WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS. — WPA/8953/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0171472026
Filing Number
WPA/8824/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/8953/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARIMAL MANDAL DEBARSHI BRAHMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
The Calcutta High Court dismissed Parimal Mandal's writ petition challenging WBSEDCL's assessment order dated 28 January 2026 for alleged electricity theft. The court rejected his plea for condonation of delay in filing the statutory appeal, noting that Section 127 of the Electricity Act 2003 imposes a statutory embargo preventing extension of the prescribed limitation period, and that adequate statutory appeal mechanisms were available. WBSEDCL was granted liberty to take coercive action in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/8953/2026
The Calcutta High Court dismissed Parimal Mandal's writ petition challenging WBSEDCL's assessment order dated 28 January 2026 for alleged electricity theft. The court rejected his plea for condonation of delay in filing the statutory appeal, noting that Section 127 of the Electricity Act 2003 imposes a statutory embargo preventing extension of the prescribed limitation period, and that adequate statutory appeal mechanisms were available. WBSEDCL was granted liberty to take coercive action in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts