UCO BANK ARIJIT GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/8912/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0170212026

Filing Number

WPA/8735/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/8912/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UCO BANK ARIJIT GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed UCO Bank's writ petition (WPA 8912/2026) on 19.05.2026 after the petitioner stated it had no further interest in proceeding, citing the rejection of an application under section 14 of the Act. The court granted liberty to UCO Bank to pursue its grievance before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, clarifying that no merits adjudication occurred and all issues remain open for DRT determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/8912/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed UCO Bank's writ petition (WPA 8912/2026) on 19.05.2026 after the petitioner stated it had no further interest in proceeding, citing the rejection of an application under section 14 of the Act. The court granted liberty to UCO Bank to pursue its grievance before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, clarifying that no merits adjudication occurred and all issues remain open for DRT determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case