ARUN KUMAR PAN KARTIK DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1610/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/147. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0170122026

Filing Number

CRR/1596/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/1610/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/147
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR PAN KARTIK DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.JAYANTA KUMAR SARKAR

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    Case Summary CRR 1610 of 2026 | Arun Kumar Pan v. The State of West Bengal The petition challenging the lower court's order to remove a boundary wall obstructing a pathway (due to claimed easement rights) was admitted. The court found the petitioner made out an arguable case requiring merit adjudication and stayed execution of the impugned order dated 30th March 2025 for six weeks or until further order. The matter is adjourned for four weeks, with the petitioner required to serve notice on the State and opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1610/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary CRR 1610 of 2026 | Arun Kumar Pan v. The State of West Bengal The petition challenging the lower court's order to remove a boundary wall obstructing a pathway (due to claimed easement rights) was admitted. The court found the petitioner made out an arguable case requiring merit adjudication and stayed execution of the impugned order dated 30th March 2025 for six weeks or until further order. The matter is adjourned for four weeks, with the petitioner required to serve notice on the State and opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case