SANGRAMI JOUTHA MANCHA AND ORS SUTIRTHA NAYEK vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/8792/2026

Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0169172026

Filing Number

WPA/8682/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/8792/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGRAMI JOUTHA MANCHA AND ORS SUTIRTHA NAYEK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed Sangrami Joutha Mancha (a government employees' organization) to hold a sit-in demonstration at Hazra More on April 12, 2026, balancing their constitutional right under Article 19(1)(b) with public order concerns. The court imposed strict conditions including a maximum of 1,000 participants, 1:00-4:00 pm duration, prohibition on processions/rallies, traffic management requirements, and sound compliance to prevent disruption to essential services. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/8792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed Sangrami Joutha Mancha (a government employees' organization) to hold a sit-in demonstration at Hazra More on April 12, 2026, balancing their constitutional right under Article 19(1)(b) with public order concerns. The court imposed strict conditions including a maximum of 1,000 participants, 1:00-4:00 pm duration, prohibition on processions/rallies, traffic management requirements, and sound compliance to prevent disruption to essential services. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case