RENUKA GOSWAMI MALAIKA ALI vs SANTOSH KARMAKAR — CO/1280/2026

Case under Property Miscellaneous Act, 1989 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0168962026

Filing Number

CO/1277/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1280/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Property Miscellaneous Act, 1989 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RENUKA GOSWAMI MALAIKA ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KARMAKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    The court disposed of petitioner Renuka Goswami's revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of Title Appeal No. 08 of 2022 by requesting the Additional District and Sessions Judge at Sealdah to finalize the appeal within four months without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner was directed to serve copies of the application and order on the respondent Santosh Karmakar within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1280/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of petitioner Renuka Goswami's revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of Title Appeal No. 08 of 2022 by requesting the Additional District and Sessions Judge at Sealdah to finalize the appeal within four months without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner was directed to serve copies of the application and order on the respondent Santosh Karmakar within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case