SHELLY CHAKRABORTY AND ANOTHER SOUNAK MANDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — CRR/1628/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0167502026

Filing Number

CRR/1568/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/1628/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHELLY CHAKRABORTY AND ANOTHER SOUNAK MANDAL

  2. 2.SATADAL CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.KASTURI CHAKRABORTY

  3. 3.SATAJYOTI CHAKRABROTY

  4. 4.SHYAMAL CHAKRABORTY

  5. 5.SANJAY KUMAR CHAKRABROTY

  6. 6.ANJANA CHAKRABROTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    The court allowed the petitioners' plea for expeditious disposal of a pending domestic violence case (Misc. Case No. 280 of 2018) that had remained undecided for over eight years. The court found the request justified and directed the lower court to conclusively dispose of the proceedings, including all interlocutory applications, preferably within six months without granting unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1628/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioners' plea for expeditious disposal of a pending domestic violence case (Misc. Case No. 280 of 2018) that had remained undecided for over eight years. The court found the request justified and directed the lower court to conclusively dispose of the proceedings, including all interlocutory applications, preferably within six months without granting unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case