KANHAIYALAL SHAW SK. MD. ANWARULLAH vs UCO BANK AND ORS. — WPA/8734/2026
Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0166872026
Filing Number
WPA/8582/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/8734/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANHAIYALAL SHAW SK. MD. ANWARULLAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UCO BANK AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging UCO Bank's SARFAESI notice dated 12th March 2026, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies available under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 (specifically Section 17 applications before the Tribunal) before approaching the High Court. The court found that the SARFAESI Act provides an expeditious and effective alternative remedy, and High Courts should not entertain Article 226 petitions when such remedies exist, particularly in bank recovery matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/8734/2026
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging UCO Bank's SARFAESI notice dated 12th March 2026, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies available under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 (specifically Section 17 applications before the Tribunal) before approaching the High Court. The court found that the SARFAESI Act provides an expeditious and effective alternative remedy, and High Courts should not entertain Article 226 petitions when such remedies exist, particularly in bank recovery matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts