KANHAIYALAL SHAW SK. MD. ANWARULLAH vs UCO BANK AND ORS. — WPA/8734/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0166872026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

WPA/8582/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

WPA/8734/2026

Registration Date

07-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

KANHAIYALAL SHAW SK. MD. ANWARULLAH

Respondent(s)

UCO BANK AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

20-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging UCO Bank's SARFAESI notice dated 12th March 2026, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies available under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 (specifically Section 17 applications before the Tribunal) before approaching the High Court. The court found that the SARFAESI Act provides an expeditious and effective alternative remedy, and High Courts should not entertain Article 226 petitions when such remedies exist, particularly in bank recovery matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging UCO Bank's SARFAESI notice dated 12th March 2026, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies available under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 (specifically Section 17 applications before the Tribunal) before approaching the High Court. The court found that the SARFAESI Act provides an expeditious and effective alternative remedy, and High Courts should not entertain Article 226 petitions when such remedies exist, particularly in bank recovery matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case