SAILEN KUMAR SADHUKHAN BIPLAB RANJAN BOSE vs CHHOTE LAL KHATIK @ SONKAR AND ANR — CO/1244/2026

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1997 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0166412026

Filing Number

CO/1252/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1244/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Possession ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1997 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAILEN KUMAR SADHUKHAN BIPLAB RANJAN BOSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHHOTE LAL KHATIK @ SONKAR AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    The court disposed of the revisional application by directing the District Judge, Howrah to expeditiously dispose of the underlying miscellaneous appeal within three months without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner was granted liberty to file written objections to the ex parte ad interim injunction order that was granted by the appellate court, allowing him an opportunity to be heard on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1244/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the revisional application by directing the District Judge, Howrah to expeditiously dispose of the underlying miscellaneous appeal within three months without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner was granted liberty to file written objections to the ex parte ad interim injunction order that was granted by the appellate court, allowing him an opportunity to be heard on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case