MAJIBUR RAHAMAN BISWAS MASOOQ RAHAMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/8516/2026
Case under West Bengal Gram Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0164342026
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
WPA/8442/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
WPA/8516/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAJIBUR RAHAMAN BISWAS MASOOQ RAHAMAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Summary: The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Majibur Rahaman Biswas, Pradhan of Sahebnagar Gram Panchayat, who challenged a no-confidence motion notice dated April 2, 2026, alleging violation of Sections 12(2) and 12(3) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. The court found that the prescribed authority properly followed all statutory procedures—the motion was received on March 27, 2026, the meeting notice was issued within five working days as required, and the meeting was convened on April 13, 2026—and held there was no illegality or irregularity warranting court interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Majibur Rahaman Biswas, Pradhan of Sahebnagar Gram Panchayat, who challenged a no-confidence motion notice dated April 2, 2026, alleging violation of Sections 12(2) and 12(3) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. The court found that the prescribed authority properly followed all statutory procedures—the motion was received on March 27, 2026, the meeting notice was issued within five working days as required, and the meeting was convened on April 13, 2026—and held there was no illegality or irregularity warranting court interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts