BRIDGE AND ROOF COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. AND ANR. KANCHAN JAJU vs ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL), KOL. AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AND ANR. — WPA/8510/2026
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act ,1972 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 24th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0162622026
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
WPA/8353/2026
Filing Date
02-04-2026
Registration No
WPA/8510/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BRIDGE AND ROOF COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. AND ANR. KANCHAN JAJU
Respondent(s)
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL), KOL. AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AND ANR.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
NEW MOTION
GR. - III (MOTION)
NEW MOTION (GROUP - III)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 24-04-2026 | GR. - III (MOTION) |
| 16-04-2026 | NEW MOTION (GROUP - III) |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 8510/2026 The court modified its previous order dated 24.04.2026 by replacing paragraph 24, granting the petitioner (Bridge and Roof Company) liberty to file a statutory appeal within 30 days of receiving the corrected order, subject to furnishing a bank guarantee for the requisite amount. The modification was made based on observations in a related case (WPA 6061/2026), allowing the petitioner a further opportunity to challenge the Labour Commissioner's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 8510/2026 The court modified its previous order dated 24.04.2026 by replacing paragraph 24, granting the petitioner (Bridge and Roof Company) liberty to file a statutory appeal within 30 days of receiving the corrected order, subject to furnishing a bank guarantee for the requisite amount. The modification was made based on observations in a related case (WPA 6061/2026), allowing the petitioner a further opportunity to challenge the Labour Commissioner's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts