SRIMATAYA MAYA HALDER LAKSHMINATH BHATTACHARYA vs UTPAL HALDER AND ANR. — CO/1221/2026

Case under Land Reforms ,1955 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0162412026

Filing Number

CO/1231/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1221/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Reforms ,1955 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRIMATAYA MAYA HALDER LAKSHMINATH BHATTACHARYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTPAL HALDER AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the revisional application by directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Diamond Harbour to expeditiously dispose of Title Suit No. 270 of 2023 (formerly Title Suit No. 223 of 2021) preferably within one year from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The petitioner was required to serve a copy of the application and order on the opposite parties within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1221/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the revisional application by directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Diamond Harbour to expeditiously dispose of Title Suit No. 270 of 2023 (formerly Title Suit No. 223 of 2021) preferably within one year from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The petitioner was required to serve a copy of the application and order on the opposite parties within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case