SULTAN KHICHI SATTIK ROUT vs SABIHA YASMIN AND ORS. — CO/1222/2026

Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0162282026

Filing Number

CO/1229/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1222/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SULTAN KHICHI SATTIK ROUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SABIHA YASMIN AND ORS.

  2. 2.ABU TALEB SABIR AHMED

  3. 3.SK. MD. FAROOQUE

  4. 4.K.M.C.

  5. 5.MUNICIPAL COMM. K.M.C.

  6. 6.MUNSHI MD. FARUQUE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the revisional application by directing the Municipal Building Tribunal, Kolkata Municipal Corporation to expeditiously dispose of B.T. Appeal No. 33 of 2020 preferably within three months from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner was required to serve the revisional application and court order on opposite parties within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the revisional application by directing the Municipal Building Tribunal, Kolkata Municipal Corporation to expeditiously dispose of B.T. Appeal No. 33 of 2020 preferably within three months from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner was required to serve the revisional application and court order on opposite parties within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case