M/S. S.N. CONSTRUCTION REPD. BY SUVENDU PAUL AND ANR. RUMKI GUHA vs BIDHAN KANTI DEWANJI AND ORS. — CO/1214/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0161462026

Filing Number

CO/1222/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1214/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Title Declaration ( 51 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. S.N. CONSTRUCTION REPD. BY SUVENDU PAUL AND ANR. RUMKI GUHA

  2. 2.SUVENDU PAUL

  3. 3.NABARUN MANDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIDHAN KANTI DEWANJI AND ORS.

  2. 2.KRISHASHREE SAHA

  3. 3.DEBDULAL NANDI

  4. 4.NIBEDITA NANDI

  5. 5.PRABHAT CHOWDHURY

  6. 6.SUBHAS CHOWDHURY

  7. 7.MINA SARKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court disposed of the revisional petition by directing the lower Civil Judge to expeditiously decide M/s. S.N. Construction's application for vacation of an ad-interim injunction order within three months, without unnecessary adjournments. The court did not overturn the injunction itself but rather mandated faster disposal of the vacation petition at the trial court level. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court disposed of the revisional petition by directing the lower Civil Judge to expeditiously decide M/s. S.N. Construction's application for vacation of an ad-interim injunction order within three months, without unnecessary adjournments. The court did not overturn the injunction itself but rather mandated faster disposal of the vacation petition at the trial court level. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case