MONI MANJUSHA NANDY RADHA NATH NANDY vs ARUP KANTI DAS AND ORS — CO/1206/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0160282026

Filing Number

CO/1212/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1206/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Title Declaration ( 51 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONI MANJUSHA NANDY RADHA NATH NANDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUP KANTI DAS AND ORS

  2. 2.ANUP KANTI DAS

  3. 3.MANIKA DAS MUKHERJEE

  4. 4.JYOTSNA DAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    The court dismissed the revisional application (CO 1206 of 2026) filed by petitioner Moni Manjusha Nandy against the City Civil Court's February 20, 2026 order rejecting her application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC. The court held that an order under Order 7 Rule 11 constitutes a "deemed decree" under Section 2 of the Code, making the revisional application unmaintainable; however, the petitioner retains the right to appeal the impugned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the revisional application (CO 1206 of 2026) filed by petitioner Moni Manjusha Nandy against the City Civil Court's February 20, 2026 order rejecting her application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC. The court held that an order under Order 7 Rule 11 constitutes a "deemed decree" under Section 2 of the Code, making the revisional application unmaintainable; however, the petitioner retains the right to appeal the impugned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case