ARNAB PRAMANICK vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1526/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 271(1). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0160152026

Filing Number

CRR/1486/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/1526/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 271(1)
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 248(1)
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 447/341/323/354/506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARNAB PRAMANICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.AMIT PRAMANICK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court allowed the petitioner's application for expeditious disposal of GR Case No. 1847 of 2022, which had remained pending since charges were framed in November 2022 despite an earlier six-month directive. The court directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur, to make best efforts to conclude the trial preferably within two months from the next hearing date, recognizing the justified grounds for acceleration based on long pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1526/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court allowed the petitioner's application for expeditious disposal of GR Case No. 1847 of 2022, which had remained pending since charges were framed in November 2022 despite an earlier six-month directive. The court directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur, to make best efforts to conclude the trial preferably within two months from the next hearing date, recognizing the justified grounds for acceleration based on long pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case