M/S. NVENT REALTY PVT. LTD. DEBJIT DUTTA vs PULIN SARDAR AND ORS — CO/1190/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0158212026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

CO/1194/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

CO/1190/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

M/S. NVENT REALTY PVT. LTD. DEBJIT DUTTA

Respondent(s)

PULIN SARDAR AND ORS

GAUR SARDAR

SISHUBALA MONDAL

AMIT KUMAR SARDAR

KARABI DHALI

KANAI SARDAR

BALAI SARDAR

SABITA MONDAL

NAMITA HAZRA

KABITA HAZRA

SHYAMAL CHA. SARDAR

HABUL SARDAR

SWAPAN SARDAR

GITA NASKAR

ANITA MONDAL

RENUKA SARDAR

KAMALA MONDAL

KAMALA BISWAS

AMAR GHOSH

HARUGOPAL BISWAS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

07-04-2026

NEW MOTION

17-04-2026

NEW MOTION

16-04-2026

NEW MOTION

13-04-2026

NEW MOTION

10-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Summary The court set aside the trial court's orders rejecting the petitioner's adjournment request and application to recall PW1 for cross-examination. While finding the petitioner's conduct lax, the court granted one final opportunity to complete cross-examination of PW1, conditional upon payment of ₹25,000 in costs to the opposite parties within ten days, recognizing that closure of evidence without cross-examination could seriously prejudice the suit outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court set aside the trial court's orders rejecting the petitioner's adjournment request and application to recall PW1 for cross-examination. While finding the petitioner's conduct lax, the court granted one final opportunity to complete cross-examination of PW1, conditional upon payment of ₹25,000 in costs to the opposite parties within ten days, recognizing that closure of evidence without cross-examination could seriously prejudice the suit outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case