KHIZIR HAYAT NILANJAN BHATTACHRYYA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/8285/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0157992026

Filing Number

WPA/8105/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/8285/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PERMITS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHIZIR HAYAT NILANJAN BHATTACHRYYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 8285/2026 The petition filed by Khizir Hayat against the State of West Bengal was heard on 06.05.2026. The case was adjourned and listed in the combined Monthly list of June 2026 because Government lawyers were not appearing due to a change of dispensation. No substantive order was passed on the petition itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Group - VII Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  4. 05-May-2026

    Group - VII Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  5. 04-May-2026

    Group - VII Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Group - VII Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    Group - VII Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  8. 21-Apr-2026

    Group - VII Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/8285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 8285/2026 The petition filed by Khizir Hayat against the State of West Bengal was heard on 06.05.2026. The case was adjourned and listed in the combined Monthly list of June 2026 because Government lawyers were not appearing due to a change of dispensation. No substantive order was passed on the petition itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case