DEBABRATA DAS AND ANR AMITESH CHAKRABORTY vs ANTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ORS — WPA/8192/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0157752026

Filing Number

WPA/8087/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/8192/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEBABRATA DAS AND ANR AMITESH CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    Summary of WPA 8192/2026 The court dismissed the petition filed by Debabrata Das and Amitesh Chakraborty challenging a District Magistrate's order under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petitioners, who defaulted on a ₹43 lakh loan, claimed violation of natural justice but the court held that an effective alternative remedy exists under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The court ruled that writ petitions should not be entertained when statutory remedies are available, and granted liberty to approach the Tribunal if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Returnable Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/8192/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPA 8192/2026 The court dismissed the petition filed by Debabrata Das and Amitesh Chakraborty challenging a District Magistrate's order under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petitioners, who defaulted on a ₹43 lakh loan, claimed violation of natural justice but the court held that an effective alternative remedy exists under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The court ruled that writ petitions should not be entertained when statutory remedies are available, and granted liberty to approach the Tribunal if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case