RAJESH SINGH DEBAPRIYA GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — FMA/530/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0157272026
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
MAT/626/2026
Filing Date
31-03-2026
Registration No
FMA/530/2026
Registration Date
01-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH SINGH DEBAPRIYA GHOSH
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: FMA 530/2026 The appellate court dismissed Rajesh Singh's appeal challenging a show cause notice issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The lower court had not quashed the notice but instead directed the Adjudicating Authority to determine whether requested documents were relied upon and, if unserved, supply them to the appellant within two weeks, with opportunity for supplementary reply. The appellate court upheld this approach, finding it protected fair hearing rights, and held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the preliminary stage—all legal challenges remain available before the appellate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FMA 530/2026 The appellate court dismissed Rajesh Singh's appeal challenging a show cause notice issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The lower court had not quashed the notice but instead directed the Adjudicating Authority to determine whether requested documents were relied upon and, if unserved, supply them to the appellant within two weeks, with opportunity for supplementary reply. The appellate court upheld this approach, finding it protected fair hearing rights, and held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the preliminary stage—all legal challenges remain available before the appellate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts