RAJESH SINGH DEBAPRIYA GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — FMA/530/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0157272026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

MAT/626/2026

Filing Date

31-03-2026

Registration No

FMA/530/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

RAJESH SINGH DEBAPRIYA GHOSH

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

07-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR,HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Case Summary: FMA 530/2026 The appellate court dismissed Rajesh Singh's appeal challenging a show cause notice issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The lower court had not quashed the notice but instead directed the Adjudicating Authority to determine whether requested documents were relied upon and, if unserved, supply them to the appellant within two weeks, with opportunity for supplementary reply. The appellate court upheld this approach, finding it protected fair hearing rights, and held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the preliminary stage—all legal challenges remain available before the appellate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FMA 530/2026 The appellate court dismissed Rajesh Singh's appeal challenging a show cause notice issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The lower court had not quashed the notice but instead directed the Adjudicating Authority to determine whether requested documents were relied upon and, if unserved, supply them to the appellant within two weeks, with opportunity for supplementary reply. The appellate court upheld this approach, finding it protected fair hearing rights, and held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the preliminary stage—all legal challenges remain available before the appellate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case