DIAPK DE DEBAPRIYA GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — FMA/529/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0157262026

Filing Number

MAT/625/2026

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

FMA/529/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIAPK DE DEBAPRIYA GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  3. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  4. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: FMA 529/2026 The appellate court dismissed Dipak De's appeal challenging a Money Laundering Act show cause notice, affirming the lower court's decision. The court upheld the original order's directions requiring the Adjudicating Authority to supply any relied-upon documents not previously served and permit supplementary replies, thereby protecting the appellant's fair hearing rights. The court held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the issuance stage; all challenges including notice legality remain open before the appellate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMA/529/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FMA 529/2026 The appellate court dismissed Dipak De's appeal challenging a Money Laundering Act show cause notice, affirming the lower court's decision. The court upheld the original order's directions requiring the Adjudicating Authority to supply any relied-upon documents not previously served and permit supplementary replies, thereby protecting the appellant's fair hearing rights. The court held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the issuance stage; all challenges including notice legality remain open before the appellate tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case