UTTAM KUMAR SAHA DEBAPRIYA GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — FMA/536/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0157242026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

MAT/623/2026

Filing Date

31-03-2026

Registration No

FMA/536/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

UTTAM KUMAR SAHA DEBAPRIYA GHOSH

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

07-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR,HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Case Summary: FMA 536/2026 The appellate court dismissed Uttam Kumar Saha's appeal challenging a Prevention of Money Laundering Act show cause notice, affirming the lower court's decision not to quash it. The court upheld directions requiring the adjudicating authority to determine whether documents requested by the appellant were relied-upon documents, and if unserved, to supply them within two weeks, with the appellant entitled to file supplementary replies. The court held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the issuance stage, leaving all legal challenges open for the appellate tribunal to address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FMA 536/2026 The appellate court dismissed Uttam Kumar Saha's appeal challenging a Prevention of Money Laundering Act show cause notice, affirming the lower court's decision not to quash it. The court upheld directions requiring the adjudicating authority to determine whether documents requested by the appellant were relied-upon documents, and if unserved, to supply them within two weeks, with the appellant entitled to file supplementary replies. The court held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the issuance stage, leaving all legal challenges open for the appellate tribunal to address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case