UTTAM KUMAR SAHA DEBAPRIYA GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — FMA/536/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0157242026
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
MAT/623/2026
Filing Date
31-03-2026
Registration No
FMA/536/2026
Registration Date
01-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UTTAM KUMAR SAHA DEBAPRIYA GHOSH
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: FMA 536/2026 The appellate court dismissed Uttam Kumar Saha's appeal challenging a Prevention of Money Laundering Act show cause notice, affirming the lower court's decision not to quash it. The court upheld directions requiring the adjudicating authority to determine whether documents requested by the appellant were relied-upon documents, and if unserved, to supply them within two weeks, with the appellant entitled to file supplementary replies. The court held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the issuance stage, leaving all legal challenges open for the appellate tribunal to address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FMA 536/2026 The appellate court dismissed Uttam Kumar Saha's appeal challenging a Prevention of Money Laundering Act show cause notice, affirming the lower court's decision not to quash it. The court upheld directions requiring the adjudicating authority to determine whether documents requested by the appellant were relied-upon documents, and if unserved, to supply them within two weeks, with the appellant entitled to file supplementary replies. The court held that writ courts should not quash show cause notices at the issuance stage, leaving all legal challenges open for the appellate tribunal to address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts