ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND ORS. ANINDYA KANAN vs RAVI AGARWAL AND ANR. — CPAN/450/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0155582026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CPAN/459/2026

Filing Date

31-03-2026

Registration No

CPAN/450/2026

Registration Date

31-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Coram

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Acts & Sections

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND ORS. ANINDYA KANAN

RAJNEESH KUMAR SINGH

SHASHI KUMAR NAYAK

RAM BALAK PRASAD

SAMARESH PRAMANIK

RAKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

RAVI AGARWAL AND ANR.

GHANSHYAM KUMAR MEENA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

06-04-2026

CONTEMPT

06-05-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL,HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Case Summary: CPAN 450/2026 In this petition (CPAN 450/2026) filed by Ashutosh Kumar and others against Ravi Agarwal and another, the court adjourned the matter for further proceedings. The Union of India was granted 2 weeks to file an affidavit-in-opposition with an advance copy to be supplied to the petitioners, who may then file exceptions within a subsequent 2-week period. The case has been listed for hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 450/2026 In this petition (CPAN 450/2026) filed by Ashutosh Kumar and others against Ravi Agarwal and another, the court adjourned the matter for further proceedings. The Union of India was granted 2 weeks to file an affidavit-in-opposition with an advance copy to be supplied to the petitioners, who may then file exceptions within a subsequent 2-week period. The case has been listed for hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case