PRAKASH CHANDRA DAS LAKSHMAN CHANDRA HALDER vs BANDHAN FINANCIAL SERVICE PRIVATE LIMTIED AND ORS. — WPA/8131/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act ,1947 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0155322026
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
WPA/7952/2026
Filing Date
31-03-2026
Registration No
WPA/8131/2026
Registration Date
01-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
AWARDS/ORDERS OF INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAKASH CHANDRA DAS LAKSHMAN CHANDRA HALDER
Respondent(s)
BANDHAN FINANCIAL SERVICE PRIVATE LIMTIED AND ORS.
BANDHAN BNK LTD
SEVENTH INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL GOVT. OF WB
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
NEW MOTION
GROUP III (MOTION)
NEW MOTION (GROUP - III)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 18-05-2026 | GROUP III (MOTION) |
| 07-05-2026 | NEW MOTION (GROUP - III) |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 8131/2026 The High Court upheld the 7th Industrial Tribunal's dismissal of petitioner Prakash Chandra Das's application under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The court determined that since Bandhan Bank operates as a multi-state banking company, the Central Government—not the state Tribunal—is the appropriate authority to adjudicate such disputes. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appropriate central authority for a fresh reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 8131/2026 The High Court upheld the 7th Industrial Tribunal's dismissal of petitioner Prakash Chandra Das's application under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The court determined that since Bandhan Bank operates as a multi-state banking company, the Central Government—not the state Tribunal—is the appropriate authority to adjudicate such disputes. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appropriate central authority for a fresh reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts