DHENU MURMU AND ANR. VARSHA ROY vs MANGAL HEMBRAM AND ORS. — CO/1171/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0154852026
Filing Number
CO/1173/2026
Filing Date
31-Mar-2026
Registration No
CO/1171/2026
Registration Date
31-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHENU MURMU AND ANR. VARSHA ROY
-
2.RABIN MURMU
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANGAL HEMBRAM AND ORS.
-
2.MONDAL HEMBRAM
-
3.CHITA HEMBRAM
-
4.SONMUNI HEMBRAM
-
5.SABITRI HEMBRAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the civil revisional application (C.O. 1171 of 2026) filed by Dhenu Murmu & Anr. against Mangal Hembram & Ors., upon the petitioners' counsel's request, due to certain mistakes in the application. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a fresh revisional application with correct particulars and allowed them to retrieve certified copies by furnishing photostat copies duly countersigned by their advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
09-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
08-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
07-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CO/1171/2026
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the civil revisional application (C.O. 1171 of 2026) filed by Dhenu Murmu & Anr. against Mangal Hembram & Ors., upon the petitioners' counsel's request, due to certain mistakes in the application. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a fresh revisional application with correct particulars and allowed them to retrieve certified copies by furnishing photostat copies duly countersigned by their advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts