SANJOY KUMAR DAS SHANKAR MUKHERJEE vs ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KOLKATA ZONE AND ORS — MAT/493/2025

Case under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act ,1988 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Apr-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0154122025

Filing Number

MAT/495/2025

Filing Date

02-Apr-2025

Registration No

MAT/493/2025

Registration Date

03-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PROVIDENT FUND ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act ,1988 Section N A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJOY KUMAR DAS SHANKAR MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KOLKATA ZONE AND ORS

  2. 2.REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-I, REGIONAL OFFICE PARK STREET

  3. 3.M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD BEING REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR OF EXIDE HOUSE

  4. 4.THE CHAIRMAN OF CHLORIDE OFFICERS PROVIDENT FUND TRUST OF EXIDE HOUSE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the appellant's claims that Exide Industries failed to pay employer's PF contributions, finding both employee and employer contributions were properly calculated with Rs. 3,18,142 paid in 2022. However, the court held that delayed payment of terminal benefits attracts interest and awarded simple interest at 8.50% per annum from 2014-15 to 2022, plus 7% per annum from January 14, 2022 until actual payment, on the principal amount minus Rs. 4,990 excess paid. Payment was ordered within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Part Heard Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Part Heard Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  14. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  16. 15-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF

  17. 15-Jan-2026

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  19. 12-Dec-2025

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  20. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  21. 06-Nov-2025

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  22. 11-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  23. 11-Sep-2025

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  24. 10-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  25. 10-Sep-2025

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  26. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  27. 22-Aug-2025

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  28. 18-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  29. 18-Aug-2025

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  30. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  31. 08-Aug-2025

    Applications (Group-III)

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  32. 28-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Lanusungkum Jamir,hon'ble Justice Rai ChattopadhyayView PDF

  33. 28-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 02-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/493/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the appellant's claims that Exide Industries failed to pay employer's PF contributions, finding both employee and employer contributions were properly calculated with Rs. 3,18,142 paid in 2022. However, the court held that delayed payment of terminal benefits attracts interest and awarded simple interest at 8.50% per annum from 2014-15 to 2022, plus 7% per annum from January 14, 2022 until actual payment, on the principal amount minus Rs. 4,990 excess paid. Payment was ordered within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case