KARTICK CHANDRA DAS TIRTHANKAR ROY vs UTTAMANANDA DAS, CHAIRMAN, TAHERPUR NOTIFIED AREA AUTHORITY — CPAN/444/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0153362026

Filing Number

CPAN/453/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CPAN/444/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARTICK CHANDRA DAS TIRTHANKAR ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTAMANANDA DAS, CHAIRMAN, TAHERPUR NOTIFIED AREA AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jul-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    Case Summary: In this contempt petition (CPAN 444/2026), Kartick Chandra Das alleged that respondent Uttamananda Das willfully disobeyed a court order dated 12.08.2025 in WPA 23015 of 2024. The court adjourned the matter to 17.07.2026 and directed the respondent to file an affidavit of compliance within three weeks, while directing the petitioner to serve the contempt application on the respondent and file proof of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this contempt petition (CPAN 444/2026), Kartick Chandra Das alleged that respondent Uttamananda Das willfully disobeyed a court order dated 12.08.2025 in WPA 23015 of 2024. The court adjourned the matter to 17.07.2026 and directed the respondent to file an affidavit of compliance within three weeks, while directing the petitioner to serve the contempt application on the respondent and file proof of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case