HRIDAY RANJAN MAJI AND ORS. ABHINABA DAN vs BIJIN KRISHNA, IAS, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PASCHIM MEDINIPUR AND ORS. — CPAN/441/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0152862026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

CPAN/449/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

CPAN/441/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

HRIDAY RANJAN MAJI AND ORS. ABHINABA DAN

NIHAR MAJI

MADHUSUDAN ROY

BIMAL MAJI

NIRANJAN KUMAR BHOWMICK

JYOTIRMAY METYA

RAMPADA BHUNIA

LAXMAN BHUNIA

SATYESWAR BHUNIA

NARAYAN CHANDRA MAJI

Respondent(s)

BIJIN KRISHNA, IAS, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PASCHIM MEDINIPUR AND ORS.

SAURAV PANDEY

SK. ASRAF ALI

PAPIYA SULTANA (IPS)

DURJAY RAY

SUJAN MONDAL

SUPRABHAT CHATTERJEE

PRABIR KUMAR SHIT

ANJANI KUMAR TIWARI

PRATIMA RANA

SHIKHA DOLAI

AJIT KUMAR MANNA

SAHADEB JANA

BASUDEV BHUNIA

MADAN MOHAN ROUT

UTTAM MAITY

TAPAN KUMAR ROUT

KALYAN ROY

SATYA CHARAN MAITY

ATANU MAITY

SANTANU MAITY

ASIT KUMAR MONDAL

ANJAN MANNA

KARTIK MALLA

APU MANNA

SUNIL MANNA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

07-04-2026

CONTEMPT

10-04-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

The court disposed of the contempt application as no further adjudication was needed, since the Assistant Director of Fisheries had already complied with the court's February 2025 order by directing pond refilling and allowing fish harvesting. The court reserved liberty for all issues regarding unauthorized pond leasing and contempt matters to be agitated in the pending writ petition WPA 6746 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the contempt application as no further adjudication was needed, since the Assistant Director of Fisheries had already complied with the court's February 2025 order by directing pond refilling and allowing fish harvesting. The court reserved liberty for all issues regarding unauthorized pond leasing and contempt matters to be agitated in the pending writ petition WPA 6746 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case