ANIL ADHIKARY AND OTHERS TAHARIMA KHATUN vs BARASAT AMS EDUCATIONAL WELFARE TRUST AND OTHERS — FMA/513/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0152632026
Filing Number
FMAT/124/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
FMA/513/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL ADHIKARY AND OTHERS TAHARIMA KHATUN
-
2.SHEFALI ADHIKARY
-
3.KALYAN KUMAR SARKAR
-
4.SONALI DEY SARKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.BARASAT AMS EDUCATIONAL WELFARE TRUST AND OTHERS
-
2.MANINDRA NATH LAIYA
-
3.ASTAMI MAITI LAIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF
The High Court dismissed FMA 513/2026 as not maintainable, holding that the rejection of a maintainability application under Section 92 CPC is not appealable under any provision of law. The court did not examine the merits and granted appellants liberty to pursue a properly constituted challenge before an appropriate court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FMA/513/2026
The High Court dismissed FMA 513/2026 as not maintainable, holding that the rejection of a maintainability application under Section 92 CPC is not appealable under any provision of law. The court did not examine the merits and granted appellants liberty to pursue a properly constituted challenge before an appropriate court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts