SUBHRO PAUL AND ANR. DIGANTA DAS vs INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AND ORS. — WPA/7982/2026
Case under Banking Regulation Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0151702026
Filing Number
WPA/7773/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/7982/2026
Registration Date
31-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBHRO PAUL AND ANR. DIGANTA DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF
The Calcutta High Court directed IndusInd Bank to defreeze petitioner Subhro Paul's account, which was frozen on March 4, 2026 based on police instruction without a magistrate's order. The court found that under BNSS Section 107, police must obtain a magistrate's order for account attachment/freezing, not act unilaterally, and since no such court order was produced, the freeze was unlawful. The bank was ordered to allow account operation while retaining Rs. 1,10,011 in lien pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Urgent Motion 1
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
Urgent Motion 1
Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao
-
07-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/7982/2026
The Calcutta High Court directed IndusInd Bank to defreeze petitioner Subhro Paul's account, which was frozen on March 4, 2026 based on police instruction without a magistrate's order. The court found that under BNSS Section 107, police must obtain a magistrate's order for account attachment/freezing, not act unilaterally, and since no such court order was produced, the freeze was unlawful. The bank was ordered to allow account operation while retaining Rs. 1,10,011 in lien pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts