SK. REJUAN ALI SUDIP SARKAR vs MANASI GHOSH, SAHADEV GRAM PANCHAYAT — WPCRC/105/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0148602026

Filing Number

CPAN/435/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPCRC/105/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK. REJUAN ALI SUDIP SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANASI GHOSH, SAHADEV GRAM PANCHAYAT

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 427 of 2026 The Calcutta High Court issued a rule of contempt against Manasi Ghosh, Pradhan of Sahadev Gram Panchayat, for non-compliance with an order dated 3rd April 2025 in WPA 1282 of 2025. Despite proper service, the respondent failed to appear. The rule is returnable on 16th June 2026 at 2:00 PM, with the court noting that the respondent may still comply with the original order pending the contempt hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRC/105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 427 of 2026 The Calcutta High Court issued a rule of contempt against Manasi Ghosh, Pradhan of Sahadev Gram Panchayat, for non-compliance with an order dated 3rd April 2025 in WPA 1282 of 2025. Despite proper service, the respondent failed to appear. The rule is returnable on 16th June 2026 at 2:00 PM, with the court noting that the respondent may still comply with the original order pending the contempt hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case