SOUTH INDIAN BANK AND ANR. VICTOR DUTTA vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HOWRAH — WPA/7811/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0148022026

Filing Number

WPA/7549/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/7811/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOUTH INDIAN BANK AND ANR. VICTOR DUTTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HOWRAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The court disposed of South Indian Bank's writ petition after the District Magistrate, Howrah passed a final order on May 5, 2026, resolving the bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Since the matter had been resolved through the District Magistrate's order, the petition became moot, and the court directed both the District Magistrate and State Authority to implement all necessary steps in accordance with law expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/7811/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of South Indian Bank's writ petition after the District Magistrate, Howrah passed a final order on May 5, 2026, resolving the bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Since the matter had been resolved through the District Magistrate's order, the petition became moot, and the court directed both the District Magistrate and State Authority to implement all necessary steps in accordance with law expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case