SHREE MADHAV EDIBLE PRODUCTS LIMTIED ARITRA SHANKAR RAY vs WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS. — WPA/7703/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0146612026

Filing Number

WPA/7471/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/7703/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE MADHAV EDIBLE PRODUCTS LIMTIED ARITRA SHANKAR RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    Summary of WPA 7703/2026 The court disposed of the petition by directing WBSEDCL (Respondent No. 3) to positively consider and decide the petitioner's October 28, 2025 representation within seven days, without expressing any opinion on the merits. The dispute involved the petitioner's claim for refund of excess electricity payments against WBSEDCL's counter-claim of outstanding dues exceeding Rs. 47 lakhs, with all issues left open for the respondent to decide according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/7703/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPA 7703/2026 The court disposed of the petition by directing WBSEDCL (Respondent No. 3) to positively consider and decide the petitioner's October 28, 2025 representation within seven days, without expressing any opinion on the merits. The dispute involved the petitioner's claim for refund of excess electricity payments against WBSEDCL's counter-claim of outstanding dues exceeding Rs. 47 lakhs, with all issues left open for the respondent to decide according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case