PARBATTI DECORATORS AND ANR. RHITAM CHATTERJEE vs UNICE RISHIN ISMAIL, IAS, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND COLLECTOR AND ANR. — CPAN/411/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0145452026

Filing Number

CPAN/419/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CPAN/411/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARBATTI DECORATORS AND ANR. RHITAM CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNICE RISHIN ISMAIL, IAS, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND COLLECTOR AND ANR.

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court admitted a contempt petition (CPAN 411/2026) filed by Parbatti Decorators alleging violation of a court direction dated August 8, 2025. The court directed the petitioners to serve the contempt application on the respondents with notice for hearing on July 2, 2026, while clarifying that pendency of the contempt proceedings shall not prevent compliance with the original court direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/411/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court admitted a contempt petition (CPAN 411/2026) filed by Parbatti Decorators alleging violation of a court direction dated August 8, 2025. The court directed the petitioners to serve the contempt application on the respondents with notice for hearing on July 2, 2026, while clarifying that pendency of the contempt proceedings shall not prevent compliance with the original court direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case