AVIJIT BHATTACHARYA ANKUSH GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7484/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0142742026
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
WPA/7275/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Registration No
WPA/7484/2026
Registration Date
25-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AVIJIT BHATTACHARYA ANKUSH GHOSH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
NEW MOTION
MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 30-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 28-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 27-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 7484/2026 The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Avijit Bhattacharya, who sought payment for 120 days of unpaid leave encashment (out of 300 days entitled under Government Order dated September 17, 2009). The court directed CSTC's Managing Director to consider the petitioner's representation and decide within eight weeks in light of the applicable government order, with the State to provide necessary financial assistance upon the petitioner's eligibility confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 7484/2026 The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Avijit Bhattacharya, who sought payment for 120 days of unpaid leave encashment (out of 300 days entitled under Government Order dated September 17, 2009). The court directed CSTC's Managing Director to consider the petitioner's representation and decide within eight weeks in light of the applicable government order, with the State to provide necessary financial assistance upon the petitioner's eligibility confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts