PARIMAL ADHIKARY SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7390/2026

Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0142222026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

Filing Number

WPA/7253/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WPA/7390/2026

Registration Date

24-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PARIMAL ADHIKARY SUSMITA DEY (BASU)

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

23-04-2026

NEW MOTION

04-05-2026

MOTION

30-04-2026

NEW MOTION

28-04-2026

NEW MOTION

27-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Case Summary: The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing CSTC's Managing Director to reconsider the petitioner's claim for full leave encashment of 300 days within eight weeks. The court found merit in the petitioner's reliance on the Government Order of September 17, 2009, which mandates payment up to 300 days, and noted that CSTC's counsel admitted to this order. The court ordered a reasoned decision with prompt payment of the balance 120 days' encashment if the claim is accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing CSTC's Managing Director to reconsider the petitioner's claim for full leave encashment of 300 days within eight weeks. The court found merit in the petitioner's reliance on the Government Order of September 17, 2009, which mandates payment up to 300 days, and noted that CSTC's counsel admitted to this order. The court ordered a reasoned decision with prompt payment of the balance 120 days' encashment if the claim is accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case