SANJIB KUMAR MIDYA SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7400/2026
Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0141842026
Filing Number
WPA/7237/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/7400/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJIB KUMAR MIDYA SUSMITA DEY (BASU)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 7400/2026 The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Sanjib Kumar Midya claiming unpaid leave encashment. The court held that the petitioner should have first filed a representation before the competent authority rather than directly approaching the court, finding no prior attempt to exhaust administrative remedies. However, the petition was disposed with liberty allowing the petitioner to file a formal representation before the CSTC authority, which shall consider it according to prevailing rules and pass a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
30-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
28-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
27-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
24-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/7400/2026
Case Summary: WPA 7400/2026 The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Sanjib Kumar Midya claiming unpaid leave encashment. The court held that the petitioner should have first filed a representation before the competent authority rather than directly approaching the court, finding no prior attempt to exhaust administrative remedies. However, the petition was disposed with liberty allowing the petitioner to file a formal representation before the CSTC authority, which shall consider it according to prevailing rules and pass a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts