SANJIB KUMAR MIDYA SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7400/2026
Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0141842026
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
Filing Number
WPA/7237/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
WPA/7400/2026
Registration Date
24-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJIB KUMAR MIDYA SUSMITA DEY (BASU)
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
NEW MOTION
MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 30-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 28-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 27-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 7400/2026 The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Sanjib Kumar Midya claiming unpaid leave encashment. The court held that the petitioner should have first filed a representation before the competent authority rather than directly approaching the court, finding no prior attempt to exhaust administrative remedies. However, the petition was disposed with liberty allowing the petitioner to file a formal representation before the CSTC authority, which shall consider it according to prevailing rules and pass a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 7400/2026 The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Sanjib Kumar Midya claiming unpaid leave encashment. The court held that the petitioner should have first filed a representation before the competent authority rather than directly approaching the court, finding no prior attempt to exhaust administrative remedies. However, the petition was disposed with liberty allowing the petitioner to file a formal representation before the CSTC authority, which shall consider it according to prevailing rules and pass a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts