SABYASACHI GUPTA SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7403/2026

Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0141782026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

Filing Number

WPA/7234/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WPA/7403/2026

Registration Date

24-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SABYASACHI GUPTA SUSMITA DEY (BASU)

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

23-04-2026

NEW MOTION

04-05-2026

MOTION

30-04-2026

NEW MOTION

28-04-2026

NEW MOTION

27-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Managing Director of CSTC to reconsider the retired employee's claim for complete leave encashment (300 days) within eight weeks, in light of the Government Order dated September 17, 2009 that mandates such payment. The court noted CSTC's admission of the government order and directed payment of the outstanding 120 days' encashment upon acceptance of the petitioner's representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Managing Director of CSTC to reconsider the retired employee's claim for complete leave encashment (300 days) within eight weeks, in light of the Government Order dated September 17, 2009 that mandates such payment. The court noted CSTC's admission of the government order and directed payment of the outstanding 120 days' encashment upon acceptance of the petitioner's representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case