PALLABI GHOSAL ALIAS PALLABI GHOSAL MUKHERJEE RUDRANIL DAS vs SHYAMALI DAS — CO/1076/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0140332026
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
CO/1080/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
CO/1076/2026
Registration Date
23-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALLABI GHOSAL ALIAS PALLABI GHOSAL MUKHERJEE RUDRANIL DAS
Respondent(s)
SHYAMALI DAS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 06-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: CO/1076/2026 The Calcutta High Court partially allowed the petition, finding that the Advocate Commissioner improperly conducted commission proceedings on November 18, 2025, by failing to record the deposition and document exhibits despite recording minutes. The court directed the Commissioner to restart examination from November 11, 2025, and complete it within two months; if the petitioner causes delay, the witness's evidence will be closed. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of the removal application but deleted adverse observations about the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CO/1076/2026 The Calcutta High Court partially allowed the petition, finding that the Advocate Commissioner improperly conducted commission proceedings on November 18, 2025, by failing to record the deposition and document exhibits despite recording minutes. The court directed the Commissioner to restart examination from November 11, 2025, and complete it within two months; if the petitioner causes delay, the witness's evidence will be closed. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of the removal application but deleted adverse observations about the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts