PALLABI GHOSAL ALIAS PALLABI GHOSAL MUKHERJEE RUDRANIL DAS vs SHYAMALI DAS — CO/1076/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0140332026

Filing Number

CO/1080/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CO/1076/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALLABI GHOSAL ALIAS PALLABI GHOSAL MUKHERJEE RUDRANIL DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMALI DAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CO/1076/2026 The Calcutta High Court partially allowed the petition, finding that the Advocate Commissioner improperly conducted commission proceedings on November 18, 2025, by failing to record the deposition and document exhibits despite recording minutes. The court directed the Commissioner to restart examination from November 11, 2025, and complete it within two months; if the petitioner causes delay, the witness's evidence will be closed. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of the removal application but deleted adverse observations about the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1076/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/1076/2026 The Calcutta High Court partially allowed the petition, finding that the Advocate Commissioner improperly conducted commission proceedings on November 18, 2025, by failing to record the deposition and document exhibits despite recording minutes. The court directed the Commissioner to restart examination from November 11, 2025, and complete it within two months; if the petitioner causes delay, the witness's evidence will be closed. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of the removal application but deleted adverse observations about the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case