MUSTAQUE GAZI ARPAN BAIRAGI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7174/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section NA. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0139922026

Filing Number

WPA/7129/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/7174/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

GRANT/RENEWAL/SUSPENSION OF LICENCE ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAQUE GAZI ARPAN BAIRAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    Gr. - VIII (Motion)

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

    Summary of WPA No. 7174/2026 The court adjourned the case to July 8, 2026, directing State respondents to file an affidavit report on the assessment and marking procedure for both the petitioner and private respondent regarding a fair price shop selection. The court found assessment discrepancies between amended notification criteria and the evaluation conducted, and granted the petitioner's request to add the District Level Fair Price Shop Selection Committee as a party respondent while maintaining the earlier interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  5. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  6. 06-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  7. 04-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/7174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPA No. 7174/2026 The court adjourned the case to July 8, 2026, directing State respondents to file an affidavit report on the assessment and marking procedure for both the petitioner and private respondent regarding a fair price shop selection. The court found assessment discrepancies between amended notification criteria and the evaluation conducted, and granted the petitioner's request to add the District Level Fair Price Shop Selection Committee as a party respondent while maintaining the earlier interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case