ALOKE KUMAR BARMAN AND ANR SOURAV SHARMA vs SMT. SHEULI BANERJEE, SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — CPAN/397/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0139782026

Filing Number

CPAN/403/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CPAN/397/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALOKE KUMAR BARMAN AND ANR SOURAV SHARMA

  2. 2.CHINMOY PANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SHEULI BANERJEE, SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

  2. 2.ACHINTYA KUMAR HAZRA

  3. 3.BUDDHADEB DAS

  4. 4.TUHIN KUMAR PAL

  5. 5.GOUTAM MUKHERJEE

  6. 6.DR. DEEPAK SEN

  7. 7.NARAYAN MAITRA

  8. 8.SANDIP MITRA

  9. 9.BAPPA BHATTACHARYA

  10. 10.SAUBHIK PAN

  11. 11.DR. HAROON RASHID

  12. 12.SOUMOK BASU

  13. 13.ASIT KUMAR DE

  14. 14.SAMIR KUMAR MAJI

  15. 15.SEEMA SAHA

  16. 16.BISWANATH NAYAK

  17. 17.NARAYAN CHANDRA GHOSH

  18. 18.BIVAS MANDAL

  19. 19.DEBABRATA CHANDRA

  20. 20.SHYAMAL NASKAR

  21. 21.MADHUSUDAN MAJUMDAR

  22. 22.DR. SANJEEV CHOWDHURY

  23. 23.DEEPAK TUSHAR BANERJEE

  24. 24.DIPAK KUMAR SENGUPTA

  25. 25.NITIN NISHANT

  26. 26.SAILESH KUMAR MALLICK

  27. 27.SUBRATA BHOWMICK

  28. 28.ANIL KUMAR RAI

  29. 29.PRANAB KUMAR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    Summary The court disposed of the contempt petition (CPAN 397 of 2026) regarding alleged violation of its April 21, 2025 order. The court found that the competent authority's September 24, 2025 order appeared to bypass the court's directions, but reserved liberty for applicants to file independent proceedings if the violation constitutes a separate cause of action, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/397/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court disposed of the contempt petition (CPAN 397 of 2026) regarding alleged violation of its April 21, 2025 order. The court found that the competent authority's September 24, 2025 order appeared to bypass the court's directions, but reserved liberty for applicants to file independent proceedings if the violation constitutes a separate cause of action, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case