SUDIP BISWAS AMBU BINDU CHAKRAVORTY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7163/2026
Case under West Bengal Correctional Services Act ,1992 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0139122026
Filing Number
WPA/7090/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/7163/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDIP BISWAS AMBU BINDU CHAKRAVORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
Case Summary: WPA No. 7163/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Sudip Biswas's petition seeking appointment as a Welfare Officer in jails on grounds of limitation. The petitioner had applied for a 2007 recruitment but approached the court only in March 2026—nearly 19 years later—claiming he was eligible but never called for interview. The court held the petition "hopelessly time barred," ruling that merely exchanging RTI communications with authorities does not extend the limitation period indefinitely, and the petitioner should have approached the court within reasonable time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
06-Apr-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
01-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
31-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
30-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/7163/2026
Case Summary: WPA No. 7163/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Sudip Biswas's petition seeking appointment as a Welfare Officer in jails on grounds of limitation. The petitioner had applied for a 2007 recruitment but approached the court only in March 2026—nearly 19 years later—claiming he was eligible but never called for interview. The court held the petition "hopelessly time barred," ruling that merely exchanging RTI communications with authorities does not extend the limitation period indefinitely, and the petitioner should have approached the court within reasonable time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts