M/S. DURGA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MR. J. CHAKRABORTY vs C E S C LTD. — WPA/10563/1994

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCA0139041994

Filing Number

WPA/13904/1994

Filing Date

24-Aug-1994

Registration No

WPA/10563/1994

Registration Date

24-Aug-1994

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

BILLING ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. DURGA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MR. J. CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C E S C LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The WPA filed by Durga Construction Company against CESC Ltd. in 1994 was dismissed for default on May 19, 2026, as neither party appeared for hearing despite notice and the case being on the Warning List. The court found that case records were untraceable in court systems and registers, and no adjournment was requested. All interim orders were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 18-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 15-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  6. 14-May-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  7. 13-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Aug-1994

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10563/1994

casestatus.in Summary

The WPA filed by Durga Construction Company against CESC Ltd. in 1994 was dismissed for default on May 19, 2026, as neither party appeared for hearing despite notice and the case being on the Warning List. The court found that case records were untraceable in court systems and registers, and no adjournment was requested. All interim orders were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case