SHIVSANKAR DEY ALIAS SHIBSANKAR DEY ANIMESH PAUL vs BIKASH CHAKRABORTY AND ORS. — CO/1073/2026

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0138812026

Filing Number

CO/1073/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CO/1073/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVSANKAR DEY ALIAS SHIBSANKAR DEY ANIMESH PAUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIKASH CHAKRABORTY AND ORS.

  2. 2.DIPAK CHAKRABORTY

  3. 3.ALOK CHAKRABORTY

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    Summary: The revisional application in CO 1073 of 2026 (Shivsankar Dey v. Bikash Chakraborty & Ors.) has been adjourned. The petitioner challenged the lower court's dismissal of his application for plaint rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, arguing suppression of material facts and lack of cause of action. The matter is scheduled for next hearing on April 28, 2026, with the petitioner required to serve copies of the application on opposite parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1073/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The revisional application in CO 1073 of 2026 (Shivsankar Dey v. Bikash Chakraborty & Ors.) has been adjourned. The petitioner challenged the lower court's dismissal of his application for plaint rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, arguing suppression of material facts and lack of cause of action. The matter is scheduled for next hearing on April 28, 2026, with the petitioner required to serve copies of the application on opposite parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case