RUPA DASGUPTA (NEE CHOWDHURY) MANIKA SARKAR vs SUJOY SARKAR, THE COMMISSIONER, BIDHANNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION — CPAN/396/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.

Next hearing 07-Aug-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0138742026

Filing Number

CPAN/402/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CPAN/396/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUPA DASGUPTA (NEE CHOWDHURY) MANIKA SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUJOY SARKAR, THE COMMISSIONER, BIDHANNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Case History

  1. 07-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Aug-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 396/2026 In this contempt of court application, petitioner Rupa Dasgupta alleged that respondents willfully disobeyed the Court's order dated 12.09.2025 in WPA 7879 of 2024. The Court adjourned the matter to 07.08.2026 and granted the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation six weeks to file an affidavit of compliance. The petitioner was permitted to amend the cause title since the contemnor had changed, with the amended petition to be served on respondents' counsel the same day. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/396/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 396/2026 In this contempt of court application, petitioner Rupa Dasgupta alleged that respondents willfully disobeyed the Court's order dated 12.09.2025 in WPA 7879 of 2024. The Court adjourned the matter to 07.08.2026 and granted the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation six weeks to file an affidavit of compliance. The petitioner was permitted to amend the cause title since the contemnor had changed, with the amended petition to be served on respondents' counsel the same day. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case